Review





Similar Products

99
Plasmidsaurus genome wide rna sequencing
Experimental comparison of codon-optimized constructs in HEK293T cells (A) Western blot analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type or codon-optimized EMG1 , JNK1 , and CREB1 constructs generated by ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, or COformer. Protein expression was detected using an anti-His antibody, with GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Quantification of protein expression normalized to GAPDH and shown as fold change relative to wild-type. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. wild-type; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. ExpOptimizer; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. GenSmart. (C) Relative transcript abundance measured by <t>RNA-seq</t> 24 h post-transfection and normalized to GAPDH . Expression values are shown as fold change relative to wild type.
Genome Wide Rna Sequencing, supplied by Plasmidsaurus, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/RNA-Seq/pmc13330525-215-12-15
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome wide rna sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ebiogen Inc genome-wide rna-seq data of zebrafish embryos at 3 dpf
Experimental comparison of codon-optimized constructs in HEK293T cells (A) Western blot analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type or codon-optimized EMG1 , JNK1 , and CREB1 constructs generated by ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, or COformer. Protein expression was detected using an anti-His antibody, with GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Quantification of protein expression normalized to GAPDH and shown as fold change relative to wild-type. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. wild-type; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. ExpOptimizer; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. GenSmart. (C) Relative transcript abundance measured by <t>RNA-seq</t> 24 h post-transfection and normalized to GAPDH . Expression values are shown as fold change relative to wild type.
Genome Wide Rna Seq Data Of Zebrafish Embryos At 3 Dpf, supplied by Ebiogen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/genome+wide+rna+seq+data+of+zebrafish+embryos+at+3+dpf/pm37898820-222-10-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome-wide rna-seq data of zebrafish embryos at 3 dpf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ebiogen Inc genome-wide rna-seq data
Experimental comparison of codon-optimized constructs in HEK293T cells (A) Western blot analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type or codon-optimized EMG1 , JNK1 , and CREB1 constructs generated by ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, or COformer. Protein expression was detected using an anti-His antibody, with GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Quantification of protein expression normalized to GAPDH and shown as fold change relative to wild-type. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. wild-type; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. ExpOptimizer; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. GenSmart. (C) Relative transcript abundance measured by <t>RNA-seq</t> 24 h post-transfection and normalized to GAPDH . Expression values are shown as fold change relative to wild type.
Genome Wide Rna Seq Data, supplied by Ebiogen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/rna+seq/ppr0664191-205-2-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome-wide rna-seq data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc rna-seq genome-wide approach
Experimental comparison of codon-optimized constructs in HEK293T cells (A) Western blot analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type or codon-optimized EMG1 , JNK1 , and CREB1 constructs generated by ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, or COformer. Protein expression was detected using an anti-His antibody, with GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Quantification of protein expression normalized to GAPDH and shown as fold change relative to wild-type. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. wild-type; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. ExpOptimizer; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. GenSmart. (C) Relative transcript abundance measured by <t>RNA-seq</t> 24 h post-transfection and normalized to GAPDH . Expression values are shown as fold change relative to wild type.
Rna Seq Genome Wide Approach, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/whole+genome+rna+seq/pm36905847-39-6-5
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rna-seq genome-wide approach - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Broad Clinical Labs genome wide rna seq analysis
Figure 3. High levels of mutant HTT specificity supported <t>by</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> analysis Allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of allele specificity of our TP-CRISPR strategies. HD subjects with the most frequent diplotype (i.e., hap.01 and hap.08) are heterozygous at 10 exonic SNPs. Thus, we performed ASE using those 10 exonic SNP sites. Alleles of those 10 exonic SNPs on the mutant and normal HTT were based on our haplotype definitions and previous sequencing analysis. We counted the alleles on the mutant and normal HTT for a given SNP site, and then calculated average values. (A) Mean allele counts of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs on the mutant HTT are summarized. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles on the mutant HTT in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 3.53e6). (B) The same analysis approach was applied to alleles of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs that are on the normal HTT. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 0.67). Each box shows maximum, 75%, 50% (median), 75% quartile, and minimum.
Genome Wide Rna Seq Analysis, supplied by Broad Clinical Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/RNA+Sequencing/pm36092363-255-1-8
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome wide rna seq analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novogene genome-wide distribution of rna-seq reads
Figure 3. High levels of mutant HTT specificity supported <t>by</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> analysis Allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of allele specificity of our TP-CRISPR strategies. HD subjects with the most frequent diplotype (i.e., hap.01 and hap.08) are heterozygous at 10 exonic SNPs. Thus, we performed ASE using those 10 exonic SNP sites. Alleles of those 10 exonic SNPs on the mutant and normal HTT were based on our haplotype definitions and previous sequencing analysis. We counted the alleles on the mutant and normal HTT for a given SNP site, and then calculated average values. (A) Mean allele counts of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs on the mutant HTT are summarized. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles on the mutant HTT in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 3.53e6). (B) The same analysis approach was applied to alleles of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs that are on the normal HTT. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 0.67). Each box shows maximum, 75%, 50% (median), 75% quartile, and minimum.
Genome Wide Distribution Of Rna Seq Reads, supplied by Novogene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/genome+wide+rna+sequencing/10__3390_slash_ijtm2030029-149-31-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome-wide distribution of rna-seq reads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Epigenomics ag genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (chip-seq) and rna-seq data
Figure 3. High levels of mutant HTT specificity supported <t>by</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> analysis Allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of allele specificity of our TP-CRISPR strategies. HD subjects with the most frequent diplotype (i.e., hap.01 and hap.08) are heterozygous at 10 exonic SNPs. Thus, we performed ASE using those 10 exonic SNP sites. Alleles of those 10 exonic SNPs on the mutant and normal HTT were based on our haplotype definitions and previous sequencing analysis. We counted the alleles on the mutant and normal HTT for a given SNP site, and then calculated average values. (A) Mean allele counts of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs on the mutant HTT are summarized. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles on the mutant HTT in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 3.53e6). (B) The same analysis approach was applied to alleles of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs that are on the normal HTT. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 0.67). Each box shows maximum, 75%, 50% (median), 75% quartile, and minimum.
Genome Wide Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (Chip Seq) And Rna Seq Data, supplied by Epigenomics ag, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/chromatin+immunoprecipitation+chip+seq+data/pmc09030334-241-23-28
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (chip-seq) and rna-seq data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc genome wide rna-seq
Figure 3. High levels of mutant HTT specificity supported <t>by</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> analysis Allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of allele specificity of our TP-CRISPR strategies. HD subjects with the most frequent diplotype (i.e., hap.01 and hap.08) are heterozygous at 10 exonic SNPs. Thus, we performed ASE using those 10 exonic SNP sites. Alleles of those 10 exonic SNPs on the mutant and normal HTT were based on our haplotype definitions and previous sequencing analysis. We counted the alleles on the mutant and normal HTT for a given SNP site, and then calculated average values. (A) Mean allele counts of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs on the mutant HTT are summarized. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles on the mutant HTT in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 3.53e6). (B) The same analysis approach was applied to alleles of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs that are on the normal HTT. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 0.67). Each box shows maximum, 75%, 50% (median), 75% quartile, and minimum.
Genome Wide Rna Seq, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/genome-wide+rna-seq+%26+microarray+data/whole+genome+rna+seq/pm35302077-1379-18-21
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome wide rna-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Experimental comparison of codon-optimized constructs in HEK293T cells (A) Western blot analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type or codon-optimized EMG1 , JNK1 , and CREB1 constructs generated by ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, or COformer. Protein expression was detected using an anti-His antibody, with GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Quantification of protein expression normalized to GAPDH and shown as fold change relative to wild-type. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. wild-type; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. ExpOptimizer; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. GenSmart. (C) Relative transcript abundance measured by RNA-seq 24 h post-transfection and normalized to GAPDH . Expression values are shown as fold change relative to wild type.

Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

Article Title: Enhancing protein expression in humans through codon optimization with transformer and contrastive learning

doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102991

Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental comparison of codon-optimized constructs in HEK293T cells (A) Western blot analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type or codon-optimized EMG1 , JNK1 , and CREB1 constructs generated by ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, or COformer. Protein expression was detected using an anti-His antibody, with GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Quantification of protein expression normalized to GAPDH and shown as fold change relative to wild-type. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. wild-type; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. ExpOptimizer; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. GenSmart. (C) Relative transcript abundance measured by RNA-seq 24 h post-transfection and normalized to GAPDH . Expression values are shown as fold change relative to wild type.

Article Snippet: Three micrograms of purified total RNA for each sample was shipped for genome-wide RNA sequencing (Plasmidsaurus).

Techniques: Comparison, Construct, Western Blot, Transfection, Generated, Expressing, Control, RNA Sequencing

Benchmarking COformer against commercial tools and learning-based models on a held-out test set COformer was compared with ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, GeneArt, ICOR, and CodonTransformer using identical held-out protein inputs. Sequence-level descriptors included (A) CAI, (B) overall GC fraction, (C) GC3 fraction, (D) uridine fraction, and (E) tAI. For (A–E), each distribution represents sequence-level values calculated for individual held-out protein inputs. Violin width reflects the density of observations, and internal lines indicate the 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile. (F) Predicted RNA secondary-structure MFE was computed using ViennaRNA. For the boxplot, the center line indicates the median, the box spans the interquartile range, and whiskers extend to the most extreme values within 1.5 times the interquartile range.

Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

Article Title: Enhancing protein expression in humans through codon optimization with transformer and contrastive learning

doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102991

Figure Lengend Snippet: Benchmarking COformer against commercial tools and learning-based models on a held-out test set COformer was compared with ExpOptimizer, GenSmart, GeneArt, ICOR, and CodonTransformer using identical held-out protein inputs. Sequence-level descriptors included (A) CAI, (B) overall GC fraction, (C) GC3 fraction, (D) uridine fraction, and (E) tAI. For (A–E), each distribution represents sequence-level values calculated for individual held-out protein inputs. Violin width reflects the density of observations, and internal lines indicate the 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile. (F) Predicted RNA secondary-structure MFE was computed using ViennaRNA. For the boxplot, the center line indicates the median, the box spans the interquartile range, and whiskers extend to the most extreme values within 1.5 times the interquartile range.

Article Snippet: Three micrograms of purified total RNA for each sample was shipped for genome-wide RNA sequencing (Plasmidsaurus).

Techniques: Sequencing

Figure 3. High levels of mutant HTT specificity supported by RNA-seq analysis Allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of allele specificity of our TP-CRISPR strategies. HD subjects with the most frequent diplotype (i.e., hap.01 and hap.08) are heterozygous at 10 exonic SNPs. Thus, we performed ASE using those 10 exonic SNP sites. Alleles of those 10 exonic SNPs on the mutant and normal HTT were based on our haplotype definitions and previous sequencing analysis. We counted the alleles on the mutant and normal HTT for a given SNP site, and then calculated average values. (A) Mean allele counts of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs on the mutant HTT are summarized. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles on the mutant HTT in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 3.53e6). (B) The same analysis approach was applied to alleles of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs that are on the normal HTT. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 0.67). Each box shows maximum, 75%, 50% (median), 75% quartile, and minimum.

Journal: Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development

Article Title: PAM-altering SNP-based allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutic strategies for Huntington's disease.

doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.08.005

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. High levels of mutant HTT specificity supported by RNA-seq analysis Allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of allele specificity of our TP-CRISPR strategies. HD subjects with the most frequent diplotype (i.e., hap.01 and hap.08) are heterozygous at 10 exonic SNPs. Thus, we performed ASE using those 10 exonic SNP sites. Alleles of those 10 exonic SNPs on the mutant and normal HTT were based on our haplotype definitions and previous sequencing analysis. We counted the alleles on the mutant and normal HTT for a given SNP site, and then calculated average values. (A) Mean allele counts of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs on the mutant HTT are summarized. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles on the mutant HTT in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 3.53e6). (B) The same analysis approach was applied to alleles of 10 heterozygous exonic SNPs that are on the normal HTT. Boxes on the left and right represent the distribution of alleles in EV-treated and targeted clonal lines, respectively. Student’s t test was performed (nominal p value, 0.67). Each box shows maximum, 75%, 50% (median), 75% quartile, and minimum.

Article Snippet: Then, genome-wide RNA-seq analysis was performed by the Broad Institute.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, RNA Sequencing, Expressing, CRISPR, Sequencing

Figure 4. On-target gene specificity supported by RNA-seq analysis To increase the sensitivity and the power to detect any small but significantly altered genes, we combined 10 targeted clonal lines targeted by L4-R4 and 10 clonal lines targeted by L4-R6 gRNA combinations to be compared with 12 EV-treated controls. (A) Significance values (un- corrected p values on the y axis) were compared with log2 (fold-change) (x axis) to highlight significantly altered genes. A horizontal and a vertical line represent Bonfer- roni-corrected significance and zero fold-change, respectively. (B) Expression levels of total HTT (mutant plus normal) based on the DGE analysis are summarized in a boxplot. Total HTT levels were decreased by 38% in TP-CRISPR targeted clonal lines.

Journal: Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development

Article Title: PAM-altering SNP-based allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutic strategies for Huntington's disease.

doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.08.005

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. On-target gene specificity supported by RNA-seq analysis To increase the sensitivity and the power to detect any small but significantly altered genes, we combined 10 targeted clonal lines targeted by L4-R4 and 10 clonal lines targeted by L4-R6 gRNA combinations to be compared with 12 EV-treated controls. (A) Significance values (un- corrected p values on the y axis) were compared with log2 (fold-change) (x axis) to highlight significantly altered genes. A horizontal and a vertical line represent Bonfer- roni-corrected significance and zero fold-change, respectively. (B) Expression levels of total HTT (mutant plus normal) based on the DGE analysis are summarized in a boxplot. Total HTT levels were decreased by 38% in TP-CRISPR targeted clonal lines.

Article Snippet: Then, genome-wide RNA-seq analysis was performed by the Broad Institute.

Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Mutagenesis, CRISPR